K Stroh
06-29-2007, 09:22 AM
There have been numerous positive articles this summer regarding Bearcat Football in the Enquirer and Post. Having been critical of those newspapers' bias against UC Football in the past, I consider their coverage the past several months to be a significant change.
QUESTION: Is this because (A) Bearcat Football is on the rise (i.e. Rutgers win and new exciting offensive-minded HC) OR (b) the changes made by the Athletic Department administration, such as the new SID, etc.?
I lean more towards (B). IMO, Bearcat Football has had a good product to sell for several years, but was undersold. I give a lot of the credit to AD Thomas and his staff for their efforts. When a group of alumni met with AD Thomas last fall and discussed Bearcat Football coverage, he asked us to be patient because due to the timing of his hire, the football marketing campaign could not be fully developed for the 2006 season. He promised changes for 2007. It appears he has delivered. I look forward to seeing the increased coverage and promotion of Bearcat Football continuing.
Go Cats!
QUESTION: Is this because (A) Bearcat Football is on the rise (i.e. Rutgers win and new exciting offensive-minded HC) OR (b) the changes made by the Athletic Department administration, such as the new SID, etc.?
I lean more towards (B). IMO, Bearcat Football has had a good product to sell for several years, but was undersold. I give a lot of the credit to AD Thomas and his staff for their efforts. When a group of alumni met with AD Thomas last fall and discussed Bearcat Football coverage, he asked us to be patient because due to the timing of his hire, the football marketing campaign could not be fully developed for the 2006 season. He promised changes for 2007. It appears he has delivered. I look forward to seeing the increased coverage and promotion of Bearcat Football continuing.
Go Cats!