BearcatNews Forums

Go Back   BearcatNews Forums > Football
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Football Discussion about the current Bearcat football team

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2012, 05:01 PM   #21
GoUC11
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Default

I don't understand where the elitism of Pitt alumni comes from. They're an ugly stepbrother to Penn State, haven't had a football program thats been a power in 2 decades (their basketball has been at a high level the last ten years), and their academics are far from being top notch.

Not to mention, you're in the city of Pittsburgh. It's not like its outside of NYC, Boston, or even Philly or some other East Coast city along those lines.

But I guess its the new thing for 'elite' programs and schools to play in a 3/4 empty football stadium that isn't theirs and have fans selling tickets on the street for less than dollar.
GoUC11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2012, 05:37 PM   #22
bobestes
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat82 View Post
Sure they did. In fact, Pitt was the most vocal opponent to UC joining--- saying that we weren't up to Big East "academic standards"--- Of course, we proceeded to have more recognized "scholar athletes" than Pitt EVERY year since we've been BEast members
Statistically, UC is a much easier school than Pitt is.
bobestes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2012, 07:45 PM   #23
Binturong05
Veteran
 
Binturong05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobestes View Post
Statistically, UC is a much easier school than Pitt is.
Pretty subjective statement to say one school's curriculum is "easier" than another due to the fact not all schools offer the same majors, the same classes per major, or even the same teaching method (hands-on vs lecture, vs study abroad vs co-op, etc).

Include me in the camp that views a modern-day college degree as a commodity where, like most things in life, the value you get out of it is a function of what you put into it. If you are a legacy admission to Yale and do nothing but skip class and sit on your futon taking bong hits are you really going to have a higher value of human capital than someone who graduated summa cumme laude at NKU? I don't think so.

Because of the variability of individual student choices after the admissions process really the only objective metric we can use in differentiating schools is their selectivity with respect to admissions. According to CollegeData.com data on Fall 2010 admissions Pitt admitted 58% of all applicants with an average ACT score of 27. UC admitted 62% of all applicants with an average ACT score of 25. While Pitt does appear to be more selective based on these metrics this tells us nothing of the ex post difficulty of the college curriculum.
__________________
"In the morning he would read the Bible with another coach. Then, in the afternoon, he would go out and cheat kids who had probably saved up money from mowing lawns to buy those raffle tickets. That's Jim Tressel." - former colleague to Jim Tressel as quoted in Sports Illustrated.
Binturong05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 01:58 PM   #24
Who Dey Time
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Default

Just announced that Fordham will essentially replace TCU on the 2012 schedule and, thus, giving UC seven home game for 2012.

They tried to schedule a "BCS" school but there were too many variables that did not allow that to come to fruition.

Also, it was announced that some ticket prices will go up, while other seating locations will go down.


http://cincinnati.com/blogs/uc/2012/...ball-schedule/
Who Dey Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 02:18 PM   #25
London 'Cat
Super Moderator
 
London 'Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London, OH
Default

Ugh! Another FCS opponent. I am not a fan of playing any FCS opponents, much less two in the same season. I know they were stuck here due to the departure of TCU to the Big XII, but this is not an acceptable replacement IMO.
London 'Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 03:16 PM   #26
GoCats1994
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Default

Curious - what does this mean (if anything) to bowl eligibility?

With 12 games on the schedule, do they have to get to 7 W's?
GoCats1994 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 04:28 PM   #27
ACAirborne
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoCats1994 View Post
Curious - what does this mean (if anything) to bowl eligibility?

With 12 games on the schedule, do they have to get to 7 W's?
Yup. They need 7 to be bowl eligible.
ACAirborne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 05:13 PM   #28
swilsonsp4
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Batavia, OH
Default

While I'm also disappointed, I'm not surprised. The conference jumping/raiding has put scheduling (& other aspects) in flux. Until this settles down, various schools will be caught with short schedules.

That said, the Fordham Rams were pretty bad last year (1-10). That makes them marginally worse than Delaware State, which I believe won three games last season.

This game will be played October 13; prime Homecoming fodder. That puts Fordham pretty much in the same boat as my high school alma mater, Finneytown, over the decades. I often joke that everyone had the Wildcats on their Homecoming schedule every week, including their road games at Finneytown.
swilsonsp4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 06:06 PM   #29
True Bearcat
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Default

At least we have 7 home games, and not a 1 for 2 to some BCS school. One year of playing 2 FCS although it sucks won't be awful. UC lost its starting offensive backfield, and has to replace a lot on the defensive side of the ball in the front 7. Maybe this will the give the guys confidence going into BIG EAST play. I personally hope never to see a FCS school again once the nBe play begins.
True Bearcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 09:14 PM   #30
UC4me
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by True Bearcat View Post
At least we have 7 home games, and not a 1 for 2 to some BCS school. One year of playing 2 FCS although it sucks won't be awful. UC lost its starting offensive backfield, and has to replace a lot on the defensive side of the ball in the front 7. Maybe this will the give the guys confidence going into BIG EAST play. I personally hope never to see a FCS school again once the nBe play begins.
I actually would rather see us play a better opponent on the road then Fordham at home. I wouldn't even care if playing on the road was a "one and done" situation. Fordham at home means about 10,000 people in the stands, most of those there having been given tickets by others, and a fan base that is left talking about a lousy out of conference schedule. We just went through a tight few weeks in basketball leading up to the NCAA tourney and got hammered for our OOC schedule. The Big East as a whole also is an "also ran" compared to a lot of other conferences. We really don't need more of these FCS opponents anywhere on our schedule or anyone else's schedule in the Big East either.
UC4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 09:31 PM   #31
Binturong05
Veteran
 
Binturong05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Default

I can't really knock it without knowing what the options were. My suspicion is the athletic department had no other choice. There are not a lot of BCS programs with the cojones to play UC. Playing UC in the regular season is a lot like getting paired up playing Boise State in a BCS bowl for a lot of the top-10 programs. Nothing to gain and everything to lose. If they win, the pundits say they should have won, but if they lose then they get ripped bad.
__________________
"In the morning he would read the Bible with another coach. Then, in the afternoon, he would go out and cheat kids who had probably saved up money from mowing lawns to buy those raffle tickets. That's Jim Tressel." - former colleague to Jim Tressel as quoted in Sports Illustrated.
Binturong05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 10:34 PM   #32
Bearcat Chris
Veteran
 
Bearcat Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Default

Thank goodness I have scheduled my vacation for the weekend of the Delaware State game! Fordham......ugh

B.C.
__________________
"Mine eyes have seen the glory! 2009 UC Bearcat Football; #3 in BCS rankings, and one field goal away from playing for the National Championship."
Bearcat Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 11:01 PM   #33
RedRocker
Veteran
 
RedRocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UC4me View Post
I actually would rather see us play a better opponent on the road then Fordham at home. I wouldn't even care if playing on the road was a "one and done" situation. Fordham at home means about 10,000 people in the stands, most of those there having been given tickets by others, and a fan base that is left talking about a lousy out of conference schedule. We just went through a tight few weeks in basketball leading up to the NCAA tourney and got hammered for our OOC schedule. The Big East as a whole also is an "also ran" compared to a lot of other conferences. We really don't need more of these FCS opponents anywhere on our schedule or anyone else's schedule in the Big East either.
They could have played @ Florida State to fill the void left by WVU reneging on their date after their move to the B12. They could have possibly worked out a home and home with FSU. Now both are left with FCS fodder.

Seven true home games with 2 FCS opponents and Miami does not justify a price increase. Stupid decision in my opinion. We'll be lucky to have 20,000 for Delaware State and Fordham unless they give a lot away for $10 or $15 which will piss off the season ticket holders.

BTW, Pittsburgh should be the opener on 9/8 as they are the only BE team with an opening on that date. Also, because of this scheduling quirk, the Bearcats have two byes in September (1st and 22nd).
__________________
RIP #12 Greg Cook (1946-2012)

Red Rocker
CoB '90 MBA '04
RedRocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2012, 11:27 PM   #34
GoUC11
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Default

Just saw the link on ESPN.com. Saying I am ticked would be an understatement.

I get it. I know the tough situation we were put in. I don't need anyone to lay that one out for me. But I'm buying season tickets to watch 2 flipping FCS teams? That is an absolute joke. I am with everyone else in saying I'd rather go on another road trip and play an FBS team. In my mind...I am paying for 2 exhibition games and 5 regular season games. Not to mention we'll have a bye week 1.

Not to mention we are going to have 22,000 for the two FCS games.

I'll support the program no matter what. But this is just a huge let down. Heck, I'd rather go out to play Nevada than do this. At least your getting exposure out west for recruiting purposes.

Delaware State and Fordham on the same schedule does nothing to help us.

We always talk about 'building excitement' for the program. Stuff like this does nothing to build excitement around the city. When you only play 2, T-W-O, games in September it allows the city to forget you exist and further allows for disinterest to take place as 2 of those games are vs crap opponents.

Last edited by GoUC11 : 03-26-2012 at 11:31 PM.
GoUC11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 08:27 AM   #35
bearcat25
Distinguished Member
 
bearcat25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Default

Wow. A little overreaction possibly? Step back and look at the entire situation every Big East team was in. With all the turmoil, the fact that we were even able to land a game this late in the year is amazing. It's 1 freaking year that we have to deal with this......relax everyone. Do I want to watch my beloved Bearcats play 2 subdivision teams? No. But I can accept the challenges that the athletic dept. had to deal with and support the team anyway.

There is no reason to question the committment of the new athletic dept in doing the right thing, building interest in the programs, and pointing us in the right direction. Whit has done some amazing things since being here, as has the rest of the group. Let's give them a pass this year and see what happens......

GO BEARCATS!
bearcat25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 01:46 PM   #36
ME80
Veteran
 
ME80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bearcat25 View Post
Wow. A little overreaction possibly? Step back and look at the entire situation every Big East team was in. With all the turmoil, the fact that we were even able to land a game this late in the year is amazing. It's 1 freaking year that we have to deal with this......relax everyone. Do I want to watch my beloved Bearcats play 2 subdivision teams? No. But I can accept the challenges that the athletic dept. had to deal with and support the team anyway.

There is no reason to question the committment of the new athletic dept in doing the right thing, building interest in the programs, and pointing us in the right direction. Whit has done some amazing things since being here, as has the rest of the group. Let's give them a pass this year and see what happens......

GO BEARCATS!
Thanks for a little sanity in this thread!
ME80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2012, 03:15 PM   #37
CaptainProbasco
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: West Lafayette, IN
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmm27 View Post
Not to mention a higher overall academic rating than Pitt... but that isn't really important is it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoUC11 View Post
I don't understand where the elitism of Pitt alumni comes from. They're an ugly stepbrother to Penn State, haven't had a football program thats been a power in 2 decades (their basketball has been at a high level the last ten years), and their academics are far from being top notch.

Not to mention, you're in the city of Pittsburgh. It's not like its outside of NYC, Boston, or even Philly or some other East Coast city along those lines.

But I guess its the new thing for 'elite' programs and schools to play in a 3/4 empty football stadium that isn't theirs and have fans selling tickets on the street for less than dollar.
Re: Both of These:
Pitt is one of the top 25 research schools in the world. UC is nothing to sneer at either (about 60th), but Pitt is a powerhouse. They deserve their academic reputation.

Also, they have another one of the top 25 research schools in the world (Carnegie Mellon) across the street from them, which gives them a lot of large, diverse programs. Sure, most of us could achieve all we'd ever want to at UC, but if you're an amazingly gifted person who has no interest in music or DAAP, Pitt offers a better shot at becoming one of those people that runs the world. Again, this doesn't make UC bad, it's just that Pitt IS that good.

Football, on the other hand, is the arena where they're reduced to boasting about their parents' generation's accomplishments.
__________________
UC MBA '08
Purdue '15
CaptainProbasco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 11:22 PM   #38
Binturong05
Veteran
 
Binturong05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Default

At least one media outlet says UC's 2012 schedule is the easiest in the Big East.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf--...SsyGgavaMcvrYF
__________________
"In the morning he would read the Bible with another coach. Then, in the afternoon, he would go out and cheat kids who had probably saved up money from mowing lawns to buy those raffle tickets. That's Jim Tressel." - former colleague to Jim Tressel as quoted in Sports Illustrated.
Binturong05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2012, 08:30 AM   #39
cmm27
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Default

Yeah, and apparantly Louisiville is going to be Big East champions and ONLY South Florida and Pitt even have a remote outside possibility of being able to maybe challenge them for the title. Nevermind the team that has actually won it three of the last four years...
__________________
In loving memory, I will be a fan for both of us.
Cody- Oct 25th 1987 to Jan 1st 2011.
cmm27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2012, 09:45 AM   #40
RedRocker
Veteran
 
RedRocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cincinnati
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmm27 View Post
Yeah, and apparantly Louisiville is going to be Big East champions and ONLY South Florida and Pitt even have a remote outside possibility of being able to maybe challenge them for the title. Nevermind the team that has actually won it three of the last four years...
That's ok, I'd rather the team play with a chip on it's shoulder. Keep underestimating us and we'll show ya'!

Like the line from Major League, "I'm for wasting sportswriters' time. So I figured we ought to hang around for a while and see if we can give 'em all a nice big shitburger to eat!"
__________________
RIP #12 Greg Cook (1946-2012)

Red Rocker
CoB '90 MBA '04
RedRocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© BearcatNews 2007